The doctrine of criminal attempts is a critical component of criminal law, designed to punish individuals who intend to commit crimes but are intercepted or fail before completion. However, the concept of voluntary desistance—where an individual willingly ceases to commit a crime before completing the offense—poses complex legal and moral questions. This paper examines the viability and legal recognition of voluntary desistance as a defense in criminal attempt cases within the Malaysian legal framework. Drawing on statutory provisions, case law, and comparative analysis with jurisdictions such as the United Kingdom and the United States, the study highlights the absence of explicit legislative guidance on the issue in Malaysia. It also explores whether existing legal principles allow for the incorporation of voluntary desistance as a mitigating factor or complete defense. The paper concludes by proposing legal reforms that would provide clarity and consistency in handling cases involving desistance in criminal attempts.