This study explores the relationship between educational pathways, career trajectories, and occupational homogamy—the tendency for individuals to partner with others in similar occupations. Drawing on longitudinal data and life-course perspectives, we examine how variations in education systems and career progression influence patterns of assortative mating in the labor market. Findings suggest that aligned educational backgrounds and synchronized career milestones significantly increase the likelihood of occupational homogamy, particularly among highly educated individuals. The study highlights the role of institutional structures, social networks, and gender dynamics in shaping career choices and partner selection. Implications for social mobility, labor market stratification, and policy interventions are discussed.

Educational pathways, career trajectories, occupational homogamy, assortative mating, social mobility, labor market, education and employment

1. Altonji, J. G., Kahn, L. B., & Speer, J. D. (2014). Trends in earnings differentials across college majors and the changing task composition of jobs. American Economic Review, 104(5), 387–393. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.5.387

2. Andrade, S. B., & Thomsen, J.-P. (2019). Educational assortative mating: A micro‐educational approach. The British Journal of Sociology, 70(4), 1245–1275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12488

3. Blommaert, L., Muja, A., Gesthuizen, M., & Wolbers, M. H. (2020). The vocational specificity of educational systems and youth labour market integration: A literature review and meta-analysis. European Sociological Review, 36(5), 720–740. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcaa017

4. Blossfeld, H.-P. (2009). Educational assortative marriage in comparative perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 35(1), 513–530. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115913

5. Bol, T., Ciocca Eller, C., van de Werfhorst, H. G., & DiPrete, T. A. (2019). School-to-work linkages, educational mismatches, and labor market outcomes. American Sociological Review, 84(2), 275–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419836081

6. Bossard, J. S. (1932). Residential propinquity as a factor in marriage selection. American Journal of Sociology, 38(2), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1086/216031

7. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2012). Occupations with the highest job gains and losses. U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2012/ted_20120730.htm

8. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2013). Northeast has highest percentage of workers employed in professional and related occupations. U.S. Department of Labor. https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2013/ted_20130904.htm

9. Cherlin, A. J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4), 848–861. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00058.x

10. Cohen, P. N., & Pepin, J. R. (2018). Unequal marriage markets: Sex ratios and first marriage among black and white women. Socius, 4, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023118791084

11. Davies, S., & Guppy, N. (1997). Fields of study, college selectivity, and student inequalities in higher education. Social Forces, 75(4), 1417–1438. https://doi.org/10.2307/2580677

12. DiPrete, T. A., & Buchmann, C. (2013). The rise of women: The growing gender gap in education and what it means for American schools. Russell Sage Foundation.

13. DiPrete, T. A., Eller, C. C., Bol, T., & Van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2017). School-to-work linkages in the United States, Germany, and France. American Journal of Sociology, 122(6), 1869–1938. https://doi.org/10.1086/691327

14. Eika, L., Mogstad, M., & Zafar, B. (2019). Educational assortative mating and household income inequality. Journal of Political Economy, 127(6), 2795–2835. https://doi.org/10.1086/702018

15. England, P. (2004). More mercenary mate selection? Comment on Sweeney and Cancian (2004) and Press (2004). Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4), 1034–1037. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00075.x

16. England, P. (2010). The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender & Society, 24(2), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210361475

17. Fan, W., & Qian, Y. (2017). Native-immigrant occupational segregation and worker health in the United States, 2004–2014. Social Science & Medicine, 183, 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.04.029

18. Feld, S. L. (1981). The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology, 86(5), 1015–1035. https://doi.org/10.1086/227352

19. Gerber, T. P., & Cheng, S. Y. (2008). Horizontal stratification in postsecondary education: Forms, explanations, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 34(1), 299–318. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134604

20. Gonalons-Pons, P., & Schwartz, C. R. (2017). Trends in economic homogamy: Changes in assortative mating or the division of labor in marriage? Demography, 54(3), 985–1005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-017-0576-0

21. Hegewisch, A., Liepmann, H., Hayes, J., & Hartmann, H. (2010). Separate and not equal? Gender segregation in the labor market and the gender wage gap. IWPR Briefing Paper, 377, 1–16. Institute for women's policy research (IWPR C377). https://iwpr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/C377.pdf

22. Hout, M. (1982). The association between husbands’ and wives’ occupations in two-earner families. American Journal of Sociology, 88(2), 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1086/227679

23. Hunt, T. C. (1940). Occupational status and marriage selection. American Sociological Review, 5(4), 495–504. https://doi.org/10.2307/2084424

24. Kalmijn, M. (1994). Assortative mating by cultural and economic occupational status. American Journal of Sociology, 100(2), 422–452. https://doi.org/10.1086/230542

25. Kalmijn, M. (2012). The educational gradient in intermarriage: A comparative analysis of immigrant groups in the United States. Social Forces, 91(2), 453–476. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sos128

26. Kalmijn, M., & Flap, H. (2001). Assortative meeting and mating: Unintended consequences of organized settings for partner choices. Social Forces, 79(4), 1289–1312. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2001.0044

27. Kalmijn, M., & Van Tubergen, F. (2010). A comparative perspective on intermarriage: Explaining differences among national-origin groups in the United States. Demography, 47(2), 459–479. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0103

28. Kirkeboen, L. J., Leuven, E., & Mogstad, M. (2016). Field of study, earnings, and self-selection. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(3), 1057–1111. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw019

29. Lazarsfeld, P., & Merton, R. K. (1954). Friendship as social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In M. A. Berger, T. Abel, & C. Page (Eds.), Freedom and control in modern society (pp. 18–66). Van Nostrand.

30. Lerman, R. I. (2013). Are employability skills learned in US youth education and training programs? IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 2(1), 2–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-9004-2-6

31. Lichter, D. T., & Qian, Z. (2019). The study of assortative mating: Theory, data, and analysis. In R. Schoen (Ed.), Analytical family demography (pp. 303–337). Springer.

32. Mare, R. D. (1991). Five decades of educational assortative mating. American Sociological Review, 56(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095670

33. Mare, R. D. (2016). Educational homogamy in two gilded ages: Evidence from inter-generational social mobility data. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 663(1), 117–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716215596967

34. McClendon, D., Kuo, J. C. L., & Raley, R. K. (2014). Opportunities to meet: Occupational education and marriage formation in young adulthood. Demography, 51(4), 1319–1344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-014-0313-x

35. McFarland, J., Hussar, B., Wang, X., Zhang, J., Wang, K., Rathbun, A., Barmer, A., Forrest Cataldi, E., & Bullock Mann, F. (2018). The condition of education 2018 (NCES 2018-144). U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2018/2018144.pdf

36. Mize, T. D. (2019). Best practices for estimating, interpreting, and presenting nonlinear interaction effects. Sociological Science, 6, 81–117. https://doi.org/10.15195/v6.a4

37. Qian, Y. (2017). Gender asymmetry in educational and income assortative marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79(2), 318–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12372

38. Qian, Z., & Lichter, D. T. (2018). Marriage markets and intermarriage: Exchange in first marriages and remarriages. Demography, 55(3), 849–875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-018-0671-x

39. Quadlin, N. (2020). From major preferences to major choices: Gender and logics of major choice. Sociology of Education, 93(2), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040719887971

40. Queneau, H. (2009). Trends in occupational segregation by race and ethnicity in the USA: Evidence from detailed data. Applied Economics Letters, 16(13), 1347–1350. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850701367346

41. Raley, S. B., Mattingly, M. J., & Bianchi, S. M. (2006). How dual are dual‐income couples? Documenting change from 1970 to 2001. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00230.x

42. Raymo, J. M., & Iwasawa, M. (2005). Marriage market mismatches in Japan: An alternative view of the relationship between women’s education and marriage. American Sociological Review, 70(5), 801–822. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000504

43. Ritter, J. A., & West, K. L. (2014). Field of study and earnings inequality among the highly educated: 1993-2010 (No. 1698-2016-138519). Minnesota Population Center.

44. Rivera, M. T., Soderstrom, S. B., & Uzzi, B. (2010). Dynamics of dyads in social networks: Assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134743

45. Roksa, J., & Levey, T. (2010). What can you do with that degree? College major and occupational status of college graduates over time. Social Forces, 89(2), 389–415. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2010.0085

46. Rosenfeld, M. J. (2005). A critique of exchange theory in mate selection. American Journal of Sociology, 110(5), 1284–1325. https://doi.org/10.1086/428441

47. Schwartz, C. R. (2013). Trends and variation in assortative mating: Causes and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 39(1), 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145544

48. Schwartz, C. R., & Mare, R. D. (2005). Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003. Demography, 42(4), 621–646. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2005.0036

49. Shauman, K. A. (2009). Are there sex differences in the utilization of educational capital among college-educated workers? Social Science Research, 38(3), 535–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.02.004

50. Shavit, Y., & Muller, W. (1998). From school to work: A comparative study of educational qualifications and occupational destinations. Clarendon Press.

51. Smits, J., Ultee, W., & Lammers, J. (1999). Occupational homogamy in eight countries of the European Union, 1975–89. Acta sociologica, 42(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169939904200104

52. Sommet, N., & Morselli, D. (2017). Keep calm and learn multilevel logistic modeling: A simplified three-step procedure using Stata, R, Mplus, and SPSS. International Review of Social Psychology, 30(1), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.90

53. Sweeney, M. M., & Cancian, M. (2004). The changing importance of white women’s economic prospects for assortative mating. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4), 1015–1028. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00073.x

54. Theil, H., & Finizza, A. J. (1971). A note on the measurement of racial integration of schools by means of informational concepts. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1(2), 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1971.9989795

55. Van de Werfhorst, H. G., & Kraaykamp, G. (2001). Four field-related educational resources and their impact on labor, consumption, and sociopolitical orientation. Sociology of Education, 74(4), 296–317.

56. Weeden, K. A., & Grusky, D. B. (2005). The case for a new class map. American Journal of Sociology, 111(1), 141–212. https://doi.org/10.1086/428819

57. Weeden, K. A., & Grusky, D. B. (2012). The three worlds of inequality. American Journal of Sociology, 117(6), 1723–1785. https://doi.org/10.1086/665035