Research Articles | Open Access | https://doi.org/10.55640/ijssll-04-02-01

Subtle Bias in the Ballot Box: Examining the Impact of Race and Negative Campaigning in Local Elections

Dr. Naomi Ellis , Department of Political Science, Hudson State University, New York, USA


Dr. Marcus Adeyemi , School of Public Policy and Governance, Midlands Research Institute, Birmingham, UK


Prof. Lila Zhang , Centre for Social and Electoral Studies, Pacific Metropolitan University, Vancouver, Canada


Abstract

This study investigates the intersection of racial bias and negative campaigning in shaping voter preferences during local elections. While overt prejudice has declined in many democratic societies, implicit racial attitudes continue to influence electoral outcomes in nuanced ways. Through a mixed-methods approach combining experimental survey data and content analysis of campaign materials, the research reveals how negative messaging—especially when racially coded—can subtly activate bias among voters without explicit racial appeals. Findings indicate that minority candidates are disproportionately affected by such strategies, often experiencing diminished voter support when targeted by negative campaigns. These results underscore the persistent role of race in local political dynamics and the ethical implications of campaign strategies in democratic societies.

Keywords

Racial bias, negative campaigning, local elections, implicit attitudes, voter behavior, political communication, minority candidates, electoral strategy

References

1. Andersen, D. J., & Junn, J. (2010). Deracializing Obama: White voters and the 2004 Illinois US senate race. American Politics Research, 38(3), 443–470.

2. Arceneaux, K. (2005). Using cluster randomized field experiments to study voting behavior. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601(1), 169–179.

3. Auspurg, K., Schneck, A., & Hinz, T. (2019). Closed doors everywhere? A meta-analysis of field experiments on ethnic discrimination in rental housing markets. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(1), 95–114.

4. Ayres, I. (1991). Fair driving: Gender and race discrimination in retail car negotiations. Harvard Law Review, 104(4), 817–872.

5. Baron, A. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2006). The development of implicit attitudes: Evidence of race evaluations from ages 6 and 10 and adulthood. Psychological Science, 17(1), 53–58.

6. Bejarano, C., Brown, N. E., Gershon, S. A., & Montoya, C. (In press). Shared identities: Intersectionality, linked fate, and perceptions of political candidates. Political Research Quarterly.

7. Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review, 94(4), 991–1013.

8. Bosco, F. A., Aguinis, H., Singh, K., Field, J. G., & Pierce, C. A. (2015). Correlational effect size benchmarks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2), 431–449.

9. Cherry, F., & Bendick, M. (2018). Making it count: Discrimination auditing and the activist scholar tradition. In S. M. Gaddis (Ed.), Audit studies: Behind the scenes with theory, method, and nuance (pp. 45–62). Springer.

10. Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), 785–810.

11. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.

12. Collins, P. H. (1998). It’s all in the family: Intersections of gender, race, and nation. Hypatia, 13(3), 62–82.

13. Daniel, W. (1968). Racial discrimination in England. Penguin.

14. Desposato, S. (2018). Subjects and scholars’ views on the ethics of political science field experiments. Perspectives on Politics, 16(3), 739–750.

15. Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 5.

16. Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (1986). Prejudice, discrimination, and racism. Academic Press.

17. Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2000). Aversive racism and selection decisions: 1989 and 1999. Psychological Science, 11(4), 315–319.

18. Ferguson, C. J. (2016). An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research (pp. 301–310). American Psychological Association.

19. Frederick, K. A., & Jeffries, J. L. (2009). A study in African American candidates for high-profile statewide office. Journal of Black Studies, 39(5), 689–718.

20. Frey, D. L., & Gaertner, S. L. (1986). Helping and the avoidance of inappropriate interracial behavior: A strategy that perpetuates a nonprejudiced self-image. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(6), 1083.

21. Gaertner, S. L., & McLaughlin, J. P. (1983). Racial stereotypes: Associations and ascriptions of positive and negative characteristics. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46(1), 23–30.

22. Gawronski, B., Brochu, P., Sritharan, R., & Strack, F. (2012). Cognitive consistency in prejudice-related belief systems. In B. Gawronski & F. Strack (Eds.), Cognitive consistency: A fundamental principle in social cognition (pp. 369–389). Guilford Press.

23. Green, D. P., & Gerber, A. S. (2003). The underprovision of experiments in political science. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 589(1), 94–112.

24. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464.

25. Hart, W., Ottati, V. C., & Krumdick, N. D. (2011). Physical attractiveness and candidate evaluation: A model of correction. Political Psychology, 32(2), 181–203.

26. Hassell, H. J. (2019). Desperate times call for desperate measures: Electoral competitiveness, poll position, and campaign negativity. Political Behavior, 41, 1–23.

27. Hedges, L. V. (1982). Estimation of effect size from a series of independent experiments. Psychological Bulletin, 92(2), 490.

28. Hentschke, H., & Stüttgen, M. C. (2011). Computation of measures of effect size for neuroscience data sets. European Journal of Neuroscience, 34(12), 1887–1894.

29. Highton, B. (2004). White voters and African American candidates for congress. Political Behavior, 26(1), 1–25.

30. Hodson, G., Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2002). Processes in racial discrimination: Differential weighting of conflicting information. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(4), 460–471.

31. Iyengar, S., Messing, S., Bailenson, J., & Hahn, K. (2010). Do explicit racial cues influence candidate preference? The case of skin complexion in the 2008 campaign [Paper Presentation]. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.

32. Jones, P. E. (2016). Constituents’ responses to descriptive and substantive representation in congress. Social Science Quarterly, 97(3), 682–698.

33. Jowell, R., & Prescott-Clarke, P. (1970). Racial discrimination and white-collar workers in Britain. Race, 11(4), 397–417.

34. Juenke, E. G., & Shah, P. (2016). Demand and supply: Racial and ethnic minority candidates in White districts. Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics, 1(1), 60–90.

35. Kelman, H. C. (1967). Human use of human subjects: The problem of deception in social psychological experiments. Psychological Bulletin, 67(1), 1–11.

36. Knott, E. (2019). Beyond the field: Ethics after fieldwork in politically dynamic contexts. Perspectives on Politics, 17(1), 140–153.

37. Knuckey, J., & Kim, M. (2015). Racial resentment, old‐fashioned racism, and the vote choice of Southern and Nonsouthern Whites in the 2012 US presidential election. Social Science Quarterly, 96(4), 905–922.

38. Kotrlik, J. W., Williams, H. A., & Jabor, M. K. (2011). Reporting and interpreting effect size in quantitative agricultural education research. Journal of Agricultural Education, 52(1), 132–142.

39. Krumpal, I. (2013). Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: A literature review. Quality & Quantity, 47(4), 2025–2047.

40. Krupnikov, Y., & Piston, S. (2015). Accentuating the negative: Candidate race and campaign strategy. Political Communication, 32(1), 152–173.

41. Krupnikov, Y., Piston, S., & Bauer, N. M. (2016). Saving face: Identifying voter responses to black candidates and female candidates. Political Psychology, 37(2), 253–273.

42. Kuppens, T., & Spears, R. (2014). You don’t have to be well-educated to be an aversive racist, but it helps. Social Science Research, 45, 211–223.

43. List, J. A. (2011). Why economists should conduct field experiments and 14 tips for pulling one off. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(3), 3–16.

44. Major, B., Blodorn, A., & Major Blascovich, G. (2018). The threat of increasing diversity: Why many White Americans support Trump in the 2016 presidential election. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(6), 931–940.

45. Matsubayashi, T., & Ueda, M. (2011). Political knowledge and the use of candidate race as a voting cue. American Politics Research, 39(2), 380–413.

46. McConahay, J. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the modern racism scale. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 91–125). Academic Press.

47. McConahay, J. B., Hardee, B. B., & Batts, V. (1981). Has racism declined in America? It depends on who is asking and what is asked. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 25(4), 563–579.

48. McDermott, R. (2002). Experimental methods in political science. Annual Review of Political Science, 5(1), 31–61.

49. Monin, B., & Miller, D. T. (2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 33.

50. Niven, D. (2017). Can Republican African Americans win African American votes? A field experiment. Journal of Black Studies, 48(5), 465–483.

51. O’Brien, L. T., Crandall, C. S., Horstman‐Reser, A., Warner, R., Alsbrooks, A., & Blodorn, A. (2010). But I’m no bigot: How prejudiced White Americans maintain unprejudiced self‐images. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(4), 917–946.

52. Pager, D. (2007). The use of field experiments for studies of employment discrimination: Contributions, critiques, and directions for the future. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 609(1), 104–133.

53. Payne, B. K., Cheng, C. M., Govorun, O., & Stewart, B. D. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 277.

54. Pfeifer, J. E., & Ogloff, J. R. (1991). Ambiguity and guilt determinations: A modern racism perspective 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21(21), 1713–1725.

55. Piston, S. (2010). How explicit racial prejudice hurt Obama in the 2008 election. Political Behavior, 32(4), 431–451.

56. Riach, P. A., & Rich, J. (2002). Field experiments of discrimination in the market place. The Economic Journal, 112(483), 480–518.

57. Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. Hedges (Eds.), The Handbook of Research Synthesis, (pp. 231–244). Russell Sage Foundation.

58. Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (2003). Effect sizes for experimenting psychologists. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57(3), 221.

59. Saucier, D. A. (2002). Self-reports of racist attitudes for oneself and for others. Psychologica Belgica, 42(1–2), 99–105.

60. Schaffner, B. F., MacWilliams, M., & Nteta, T. (2018). Understanding white polarization in the 2016 vote for president: The sobering role of racism and sexism. Political Science Quarterly, 133(1), 9–34.

61. Schneider, M. C., & Bos, A. L. (2011). An exploration of the content of stereotypes of black politicians. Political Psychology, 32(2), 205–233.

62. Smith, R. M., & King, D. S. (2009). Barack Obama and the future of American racial politics. Du Bois Review, 6(1), 25.

63. Smooth, W. (2006). Intersectionality in electoral politics: A mess worth making. Politics & Gender, 2(3), 400.

64. Stephens-Davidowitz, S. (2014). The cost of racial animus on a black candidate: Evidence using Google search data. Journal of Public Economics, 118, 26–40.

65. Stockemer, D., & Praino, R. (2015). Blinded by beauty? Physical attractiveness and candidate selection in the US house of representatives. Social Science Quarterly, 96(2), 430–443.

66. Teele, D. L. (2014). Reflections on the ethics of field experiments. In D. Teele (Ed.), Field experiments and their critics (pp. 115–140). Yale University Press.

67. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76(2), 105.

68. Voss, D. S., & Lublin, D. (2001). Black incumbents, white districts: An appraisal of the 1996 congressional elections. American Politics Research, 29(2), 141–182.

69. Zarefsky, D. (2004). Presidential rhetoric and the power of definition. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 34(3), 607–619.

70. Zschirnt, E., & Ruedin, D. (2016). Ethnic discrimination in hiring decisions: A meta-analysis of correspondence tests 1990–2015. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(7), 1115–1134.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Subtle Bias in the Ballot Box: Examining the Impact of Race and Negative Campaigning in Local Elections. (2024). International Journal of Social Sciences, Language and Linguistics, 4(02), 01-07. https://doi.org/10.55640/ijssll-04-02-01