Research Articles | Open Access | https://doi.org/10.55640/ijssll-06-09-05

Self-Regulated Learning in Generative AI-Assisted Academic Writing: A Systematic Review of ESL/EFL University Students

Dr Julia Indongo , Namibia University of Science and Technology
https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3938-8573

Dr Sylvia Ithindi , Namibia University of Science and Technology
https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2142-0737

Abstract

The growing use of generative AI writing assistants, such as ChatGPT, in ESL/EFL academic contexts has sparked debate about their influence on self-regulated learning (SRL). This systematic review examines 41 empirical studies published between 2021 and March 2026 to evaluate how university students engage with AI tools in relation to SRL. Guided by PRISMA 2020 standards, the review synthesises quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research through narrative analysis, drawing on Zimmerman’s (2000) three phase SRL model and metacognitive regulation theory. Three central patterns emerge. First, SRL phases are unevenly addressed: the performance phase dominates (92.7% of studies), while forethought (58.5%) and self-reflection (51.2%) receive less attention, suggesting an incomplete regulatory cycle. Second, AI demonstrates a dual role in metacognitive regulation, facilitating monitoring, evaluation, and revision (68.3%), yet also contributing to cognitive offloading and reduced learner agency (14.6%), with 17.1% of studies reporting mixed outcomes. Third, pedagogical design is critical: structured approaches that integrate AI literacy, guided feedback, and teacher mediation consistently enhance SRL, whereas unguided use yields weaker results. The evidence base remains limited by its concentration in Asian contexts (73.2%), reliance on self-report data, and absence of longitudinal designs, restricting claims about sustained competence. Overall, the review concludes that generative AI can strengthen self-regulated academic writing when embedded in intentional pedagogical frameworks that activate all SRL phases; without such alignment, AI may improve immediate performance but hinder the development of lasting regulatory skills.

Keywords

self-regulated learning, generative AI, academic writing, ESL/EFL, metacognitive regulation, systematic review

References

1. Alexander, K. and Savvidou, C. (2025) ‘Reflecting on Chapelle’s view of open GenAI’s role in language education: Using ChatGPT for academic writing courses in higher education’, Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 51, pp. 203–225. Available at: https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2025.51.02.

2. Amani, N. and Bisriyah, M. (2025) ‘University students’ perceptions of AI-assisted writing tools in supporting self-regulated writing practices’, Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 10(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v10i1.1942.

3. Arif, H. and Naeem, J. (2025) ‘The impact of generative AI on learner autonomy and critical thinking in English as a foreign language (EFL) writing classrooms’, Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL (JALT), 8(3), pp. 2269–2290.

4. Aromataris, E. and Munn, Z. (eds.) (2020) JBI manual for evidence synthesis. Joanna Briggs Institute. Available at: https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-01.

5. Banihashem, S.K., Bond, M., Bergdahl, N., Khosravi, H. and Noroozi, O. (2025) ‘A systematic mapping review at the intersection of artificial intelligence and self-regulated learning: A call for increased theoretical grounding, focus on motivation and diversifying context’, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(50), pp. 1–46. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00548-8.

6. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), pp. 77–101. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

7. Chauhan, P. (2022) ‘Fundamentals of academic writing: A literature review’, Journal of NELTA, 27(1–2), pp. 161–170. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3126/nelta.v27i1-2.53201.

8. Chen, J. and Alibakhshi, G. (2026) ‘AI-powered applications’ effects on English language learners’ cognitive, metacognitive, and resource management strategies, and language achievement’, Computer Assisted Learning. (In press; DOI not yet indexed).

9. Chung, E. and Wan, A. (2025) ‘Examining the use of academic vocabulary in first-year ESL undergraduates’ writing: A corpus-driven study in Hong Kong’, Assessing Writing, 63, p. 100913. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100913.

10. Conde Gafaro, B. (2022) ‘Self-regulated learning in MOOCs: Goal setting and goal orientation’, in Rienties, B., Hampel, R., Scanlon, E. and Whitelock, D. (eds.) Open world learning: Research, innovation and the challenges of high-quality education. Routledge, pp. 63–75.

11. de Mooij, S., Lamsa, J., Lim, L., Aksela, O., Athavale, S., Bistolfi, I., Jin, F., Li, T., Azevedo, R., Bannert, M., Gašević, D., Järvelä, S. and Molenaar, I. (2025) ‘A systematic review of self-regulated learning through integration of multimodal data and artificial intelligence’, Educational Psychology Review, 37, p. 54. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10028-0.

12. Diasti, K.S. and Murniati, C.T. (2026) ‘EFL students’ self-regulation in the writing process using ChatGPT’, Journal of English Teaching, Literature, and Applied Linguistics, 10(1), pp. 133–138. (DOI not yet indexed; journal forthcoming).

13. EL Hosayny, O., Razkane, H. and Yeou, M. (2025) ‘Metacognitive regulation and ChatGPT-assisted writing: Introducing an interactive model for cultivating strategic engagement’, Discover Education, 4(1), pp. 1–23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-026-01282-7.

14. Fajaryani, N., et al. (2025) ‘Navigating the use of AI in academic writing: Challenges and strategies for EFL students’, EDUTICON Conference Proceedings. (DOI not available).

15. Hao, H. and Razali, A.B. (2026) ‘Impact of AI-assisted peer feedback on EFL students’ self-regulated learning, self-efficacy, and motivation in English academic writing’, International Journal of Instruction, 19(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2026.1929a.

16. Hapsari, D. and Rizky, A. (2025) ‘Indonesian EFL students’ perception of AI applications to support SRL’, Atlantis Press, Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-394-8_46.

17. Hsu, L. (2025) ‘Entangled cognition in EFL education: The role of generative AI’, Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(4), ep619. Available at: https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/17621.

18. Huang, J. and Mizumoto, A. (2025) ‘The effects of generative AI usage in EFL classrooms on the L2 motivational self system’, Education and Information Technologies, 30, pp. 6435–6454. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12717-9.

19. Irgatoğlu, A., Selvi, A.E., Yurttadur, O. and Dağbaşi, G. (2025) ‘Sustainable L2 writing pedagogy: Effects of AI-mediated feedback on SRL’, Preprints.org. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202601.2397.v1.

20. Jang, H., Jin, L. and So, H. (2026) ‘Examining university students’ engagement with ChatGPT in English essay writing: Interaction patterns and perceptions’, The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-025-01076-9.

21. Jin, L., et al. (2025) ‘ESL/EFL international postgraduates’ SRL strategies in academic writing with ChatGPT’, Education Sciences, 15(11), p. 1521. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15111521.

22. Jin, S.-H., Im, K., Yoo, M., Roll, I. and Seo, K. (2023) ‘Supporting students’ self-regulated learning in online learning using artificial intelligence applications’, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(37). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00406-5.

23. Kanont, K., Pingmuang, P., Simasathien, T., Wisnuwong, S., Wiwatsiripong, B., Poonpirome, K., Songkram, N. and Khlaisang, J. (2024) ‘Generative-AI, a learning assistant? Factors influencing higher-ed students’ technology acceptance’, Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 22(6), pp. 18–33. Available at: https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.22.6.3196.

24. Ky, M. and Lian, A. (2025) ‘A comparative analysis of academic literacy support models: Impacts on SRL for international students’, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5). Available at: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.10486.

25. Lan, M. and Zhou, X. (2025) ‘A qualitative systematic review on AI-empowered self-regulated learning in higher education’, npj Science of Learning, 10(21). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00319-0.

26. Luo, L. and Yusuf, A. (2025) ‘Bridging AI and pedagogy: How AI-adaptive feedback shapes Chinese EFL students’ writing engagement, metacognitive strategies, and performance’, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2548919.

27. Mäkipää, T. and Tsagari, D. (2026) ‘Feedback and self-regulation in L2 writing: A research timeline of formative assessment’, Language Teaching, 59(1), pp. 1–20.

28. Mazari, N. (2025) ‘Building metacognitive skills using AI tools to help higher education students reflect on their learning process’, RHS-Revista Humanismo y Sociedad, 13(1), pp. 1–20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22209/rhs.v13n1a04.

29. McHugh, M.L. (2012) ‘Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic’, Biochemia Medica, 22(3), pp. 276–282. Available at: https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031.

30. Molenaar, I., de Mooij, S., Azevedo, R., Bannert, M., Järvelä, S. and Gašević, D. (2023) ‘Measuring self-regulated learning and the role of AI: Five years of research using multimodal multichannel data’, Computers in Human Behavior, 139, p. 107540. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107540.

31. Mujeeb, N., Lodhi, M.A., Ali, A., Mashwani, W.K., Mostafa, S.M. and Ahmadini, A.A.H. (2026) ‘Beyond red ink: AI feedback and ESL academic writing development in higher education’, Language Testing in Asia, 16(1), p. 24. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-026-00442-8.

32. Nguyen, A., Ilesanmi, F., Dang, B., Vuorenmaa, E. and Järvelä, S. (2024) ‘Hybrid intelligence in academic writing: Examining self-regulated learning patterns in an AI-assisted writing task’, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 386, pp. 241–254. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA240198.

33. Nguyen, Q.N. and Doan, D.T.H. (2025) ‘ChatGPT’s effects on EFL learners’ autonomy and self-efficacy in self-regulated learning contexts’, JALT CALL Journal, 21(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v21n2.102968.

34. Nguyen, T. (2025) ‘Investigating writing self-efficacy and SRL strategies among ESL majors’, SAGE Open. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251406353.

35. Nikolopoulou, K. (2024) ‘Generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Exploring ways of harnessing pedagogical practices with the assistance of ChatGPT’, International Journal of Changes in Education, 1(2), pp. 103–111. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE42022489.

36. Page, M.J., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C.D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J.M., Akl, E.A., Brennan, S.E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J.M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M.M., Li, T., Loder, E.W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021) ‘The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews’, BMJ, 372, n71. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.

37. Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., Britten, N., Roen, K. and Duffy, S. (2006) Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. ESRC Methods Programme. Available at: http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/shm/research/nssr/research/dissemination/publications/NS_Synthesis_Guidance_v1.pdf.

38. Qazi, M.H., Munir, T., Zaigham, M.S. and Mughal, U.A. (2025) ‘The impact of AI-assisted self-regulated learning, specifically ChatGPT, on students’ engagement and writing skill enhancement’, Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL (JALT), 8(1), pp. 393–415.

39. Rahnuma, N. (2025) ‘Exploring ESL students’ experiences of academic writing in higher education: A cultural historical activity theory perspective’, Education Inquiry, 16(3), pp. 303–325. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2023.2222450.

40. Sagita, M., Sagita, E.S. and Syafari, N. (2025) ‘The role of generative AI companions in promoting reading engagement and self-regulation in EFL contexts’, PES: Pendidikan English Scholar, 4(3), pp. 448–465.

41. Salmani Nodoushan, M.A. (2012) ‘Self-regulated learning (SRL): Emergence of the RSRLM model’, International Journal of Language Studies, 6(3), pp. 1–16.

42. Selvadurai, V., Rodrigues, P. and Rajamohan, L. (2024) ‘Engaging with AI: Exploring ChatGPT’s role in self-regulation and pre-writing stage’, Proceedings of the VietTESOL International Convention 2024, pp. 211–227.

43. Shen, B. and Bai, B. (2024) ‘Enhancing Chinese university students’ writing performance and self-regulated learning (SRL) writing strategy use through a strategy-based intervention’, System, 122, p. 103249. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103249.

44. Shi, H., Chai, C.S., Zhou, S. and Aubrey, S. (2025) ‘Comparing the effects of ChatGPT and automated writing evaluation on students’ writing and ideal L2 writing self’, Computer Assisted Language Learning. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.2454541.

45. Sinkkonen, M. and Tapani, A. (2024) ‘Review of the concept “Self-Regulated Learning”: Defined and used in different educational contexts’, International Journal on Social and Education Sciences, 6(1), pp. 130–151. Available at: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.640.

46. Stofiana, T., Sunendar, D., Mulyati, Y. and Sastromiharjo, A. (2025) ‘Metacognition-based academic writing with generative-AI scaffolding: Student and instructor needs’, Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 14(1), pp. 1–18.

47. Tanharat, N. and Phootirat, P. (2025) ‘Integrating generative AI in EFL academic writing: Thai English-major students’ purposes, perceptions, and experiences with ChatGPT’, rEFLections, 32(3), pp. 188–211.

48. Tekir, S. (2026) ‘Generative AI use in EFL writing: Associations with originality, critical reasoning, and metacognitive engagement in a Turkish higher education context’, Computer Assisted Language Learning, pp. 1–23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2026.2617399.

49. Teng, M.F. (2025) ‘Metacognitive awareness and EFL learners’ perceptions and experiences in utilising ChatGPT for writing feedback’, European Journal of Education, 60(1), e12811. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12811.

50. Torsani, S. (2025) ‘Developing self-regulation for generative AI through a metacognitive checklist: A case study of an in-service language teacher’, Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(4), pp. 1–20.

51. Trinovita, D., Nurchurifiani, E., Hastomo, T., Andewi, W. and Hasbi, M. (2025) ‘Exploring the influence of generative AI on self-regulated learning: A mixed-methods study in the EFL context’, Jurnal Iqra’: Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 10(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v10i2.6389.

52. Van Horn, K.R. (2024) ‘ChatGPT in English language learning: Exploring perceptions and promoting autonomy in a university EFL context’, TESL-EJ, 28(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.28109a8.

53. Wang, Y. (2024) ‘Cognitive and sociocultural dynamics of self-regulated use of machine translation and generative AI tools in academic EFL writing’, System, 126, p. 103505. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103505.

54. Wu, X.-Y., Ng, D.T.K. and Chiu, T.K.F. (2026) ‘Self-regulated learning with AI: A comparative analysis of general-purpose and task-specific platforms’, International Journal of Technology in Education, 9(1), pp. 279–302.

55. Xu, J., Luo, Y., Wang, C., Wang, M. and Wu, Y. (2026) ‘AI support in self-regulated learning: A decade of technological evolution and meta-analysis’, British Journal of Educational Technology, 57(1), pp. 1–30. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.70058.

56. Yang, K., Raković, M., Fan, Y., Tang, L., Li, X. and Gašević, D. (2025) ‘Beyond self-regulated learning processes: Hidden tactics in generative AI-assisted writing’, arXiv. Available at: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.12345.

57. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7

58. Zhang, Z., Zhou, S. and Bai, B. (2025) ‘A systematic scoping review of self-regulated learning with AI in language education’, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, pp. 1–14. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.70030.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Indongo, J., & Ithindi, S. (2026). Self-Regulated Learning in Generative AI-Assisted Academic Writing: A Systematic Review of ESL/EFL University Students. International Journal of Social Sciences, Language and Linguistics, 6(09), 381-395. https://doi.org/10.55640/ijssll-06-09-05