Adolescents within the youth justice secure estate represent a uniquely vulnerable population whose voices are often marginalized. Understanding their lived experiences is crucial for developing effective and humane rehabilitation and support strategies. This systematic literature review synthesizes qualitative research exploring the perspectives of young people in secure settings. It identifies key themes related to their daily lives, relationships, education, mental health, and aspirations for the future. The findings underscore the importance of fostering positive relationships, providing tailored educational opportunities, addressing complex needs, and genuinely integrating youth perspectives into policy and practice. This review aims to contribute to a more child-centric approach within the youth justice system, advocating for environments that promote growth, well-being, and successful reintegration.

Adolescent experiences, youth justice, secure estate, juvenile detention, systematic literature review, incarcerated youth

1. Abram, Karen M., Linda A. Teplin, Gary M. McClelland, and Mina K. Dulcan. 2003. Comorbid psychiatric disorders in youth in juvenile detention. Archives of General Psychiatry 60: 1097–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2. Barnert, Elizabeth S., Raymond Perry, Veronica F. Azzi, Rashmi Shetgiri, Gery Ryan, Rebecca Dudovitz, Bonnie Zima, and Paul J. Chung. 2015. Incarcerated youths’ perspectives on protective factors and risk factors for juvenile offending: A qualitative analysis. American Journal of Public Health 105: 1365–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

3. Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3: 77–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

4. Brubaker, Sarah Jane, and Hayley M. D. Cleary. 2023. Connection and caring through a therapeutic juvenile corrections model: Staff and youth resident perceptions of structural and interpersonal dimensions. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 67: 373–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

5. Case, Stephen, Kevin Haines, Sean Creaney, Nicola Coleman, Ross Little, and Victoria Worrall. 2020. Trusting children to enhance youth justice policy: The importance and value of children’s voices. Youth Voice Journal 2020: 25–40. [Google Scholar]

6. Creaney, Sean. 2014. The benefits of participation for young offenders. Safer Communities 13: 126–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

7. Day, Anne-Marie. 2021. The experiences of children in custody: A story of survival. Safer Communities 20: 159–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

8. Ellis, Katie. 2018. Contested vulnerability: A case study of girls in secure care. Children and Youth Services Review 88: 156–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

9. Ellis, Katie, and Penny Curtis. 2021. Care (ful) relationships: Supporting children in secure care. Child & Family Social Work 26: 329–37. [Google Scholar]

10. Enell, Sofia. 2017. ‘I Got to Know Myself Better, My Failings and Faults’ Young People’s Understandings of being Assessed in Secure Accommodation. Young 25: 124–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

11. Fitzsimons, Dermot, and Ann Clark. 2021. Pausing mid-sentence: An ecological model approach to language disorder and lived experience of young male offenders. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18: 1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

12. Goffman, Erving. 1961. Asylums. New York: Anchor Books. [Google Scholar]

13. Gough, David. 2007. Weight of evidence: A framework for the appraisal of the quality and relevance of evidence. Research Papers in Education 22: 213–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

14. Gudjonsson, Gisli H., Jon Fridrik Sigurdsson, Inga Dora Sigfusdottir, and Susan Young. 2014. A national epidemiological study of offending and its relationship with ADHD symptoms and associated risk factors. Journal of Attention Disorders 18: 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

15. Hazel, Neal. 2008. Cross-National Comparison of Youth Justice. London: Youth Justice Board for England and Wales (YJB). [Google Scholar]

16. Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service, HMPPS. 2021. Youth Justice Statistics. Available online: https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Children-in-custody-secure-training-centres-and-secure-schools.pdf (accessed on 14 July 2023).

17. Hopkins, Thomas, Judy Clegg, and Joy Stackhouse. 2016. Young offenders’ perspectives on their literacy and communication skills. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 51: 95–109. [Google Scholar]

18. Howard League for Penal Reform. 2022. Children on Remand: Voices and Lessons. England and Wales. Available online: https://howardleague.org/publications/children-on-remand/ (accessed on 18 July 2023).

19. Hughes, Nathan. 2015. Understanding the influence of neurodevelopmental disorders on offending: Utilizing developmental psychopathology in biosocial criminology. Criminal Justice Studies: A Critical Journal of Crime, Law and Society 28: 39–60. [Google Scholar]

20. Hughes, Nathan, Huw Williams, Prathiba Chitsabesan, Rebecca Davies, and Luke Mounce. 2012. Nobody Made the Connection: The Prevalence of Neurodisability in Young People Who Offend; London: Office of the Children’s Commissioner for England.

21. Jacob, Jenna, Sophie D’Souza, Rebecca Lane, Liz Cracknell, Rosie Singleton, and Julian Edbrooke-Childs. 2023. “I’m not Just Some Criminal, I’m Actually a Person to Them Now”: The Importance of Child-Staff Therapeutic Relationships in the Children and Young People Secure Estate. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 23: 24–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

22. Juliana, Jesika, Fonny Dameaty Hutagalung, and Azmawaty Mohamad Nor. 2024. Psychological Experience of Juvenile Offenders in Correctional Institutions: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies. Journal of Population and Social Studies [JPSS] 32: 609–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

23. Lambie, Ian, and Isabel Randell. 2013. The impact of incarceration on juvenile offenders. Clinical Psychology Review 33: 448–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

24. Lane, Jodi, Lonn Lanza-Kaduce, Charles E. Frazier, and Donna M. Bishop. 2002. Adult versus juvenile sanctions: Voices of incarcerated youths. Crime & Delinquency 48: 431–55. [Google Scholar]

25. Little, Ross. 2015. Putting education at the heart of custody? The views of children on education in a Young Offender Institution. British Journal of Community Justice 13: 27. [Google Scholar]

26. Lyttleton-Smith, Jen, and Hannah Bayfield. 2023. Dragged kicking and screaming: Agency and violence for children entering secure accommodation. Children & Society 38: 317–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

27. Mays, Nicholas, and Catherine Pope. 2000. Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Education) 320: 50–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

28. Moore, Linda Weaver, and Margaret Miller. 1999. Initiating research with doubly vulnerable populations. Journal of Advanced Nursing 30: 1034–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

29. National Audit Office. 2022. Children in Custody: Secure Training Centres and Secure Schools; London: National Audit Office. Available online: https://www.nao.org.uk/reports/children-in-custody/ (accessed on 14 July 2023).

30. Nolet, Anne-Marie, Yanick Charette, and Fanny Mignon. 2022. The effect of prosocial and antisocial relationships structure on offenders’ optimism towards desistance. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 64: 59–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

31. Noyes, Jane, Andrew Booth, Kate Flemming, Ruth Garside, Angela Harden, Simon Lewin, Tomas Pantoja, Karin Hannes, Margaret Cargo, and James Thomas. 2018. Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group Guidance Paper 3: Methods for assessing methodological limitations, data extraction and synthesis, and confidence in synthesized qualitative findings. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 97: 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

32. O’Grady, Emmanuel. 2017. ‘Learning to be more human’: Perspectives of respect by young Irish people in prison. Journal of Prison Education and Re-Entry 4: 4–16. [Google Scholar]

33. Oostermeijer, Sanne, Poni Tongun, and Diana Johns. 2024. Relational security: Balancing care and control in a youth justice detention setting in Australia. Children and Youth Services Review 156: 107312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

34. Pederson, Casey A., Paula J. Fite, and Jonathan L. Poquiz. 2021. Demographic differences in youth perceptions of staff: A national evaluation of adjudicated youth. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 65: 1143–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

35. Pyle, Nicole, Andrea Flower, Anna Mari Fall, and Jacob Williams. 2016. Individual-level risk factors of incarcerated youth. Remedial and Special Education 37: 172–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

36. Reed, Lauren A., Jill D. Sharkey, and Althea Wroblewski. 2021. Elevating the voices of girls in custody for improved treatment and systemic change in the juvenile justice system. American Journal of Community Psychology 67: 50–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

37. Rogers, Lynne, Jane Hurry, Margaret Simonot, and Anita Wilson. 2014. The Aspirations and Realities of Prison Education for Under-25s in the London Area. London: London Review of Education. [Google Scholar]

38. Sander, Janay B., Jill D. Sharkey, Roger Olivarri, Diane A. Tanigawa, and Tory Mauseth. 2010. A qualitative study of juvenile offenders, student engagement, and interpersonal relationships: Implications for research directions and preventionist approaches. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation 20: 288–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

39. Shafi, Adeela. 2019. The complexity of disengagement with education and learning: A case study of young offenders in a secure custodial setting in England. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR) 24: 323–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

40. Steele, Jennifer L., Robert Bozick, and Lois M. Davis. 2016. Education for incarcerated juveniles: A meta-analysis. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR) 21: 65–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

41. Taylor, Charlie. 2016. Review of the Youth Justice System in England and Wales; London: Ministry of Justice.

42. Thomas, James, and Angela Harden. 2008. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology 8: 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

43. United Nations. 1989. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). General Assembly Resolution 44/25, 20 November 1989. Available online: https://www.unicef.org/child-rights-convention/convention-text (accessed on 14 July 2023).

44. Welland, Sarah, Linda J. Duffy, and Bahman Baluch. 2020. Rugby as a rehabilitation program in a United Kingdom Male Young Offenders’ Institution: Key findings and implications from mixed methods research. Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation 16: 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

45. Youth Custody Service. 2023. Youth Custody Data 14 July 2023. Available online: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/youth-custody-data (accessed on 14 July 2023).