Research Articles
| Open Access |
https://doi.org/10.55640/ijssll-06-02-07
Who Sells Knowledge and Who Bears the Risk? Students, Markets, and the Uncertain Value of Education
Abstract
Contemporary education systems are increasingly shaped by market-oriented logics in which curricula, credentials, and learning pathways are designed, priced, and promoted as investments in future employability and social mobility. Within this configuration, critical questions arise regarding who determines what counts as valuable knowledge, who profits from its delivery, and who ultimately bears the risk when educational promises fail to translate into meaningful life and labour outcomes. This paper critically examines the political economy of education by interrogating education as a traded promise, one sold by institutions, regulated by policy frameworks, and purchased by students under conditions of profound uncertainty.
Drawing on human capital theory, critical political economy, and constructivist perspectives, the paper argues that contemporary education systems increasingly externalise risk onto learners, while decision-making power over curriculum relevance, credential value, and labour-market alignment remains concentrated among policymakers, accrediting bodies, and education providers. Students, positioned as rational consumers, are expected to invest time, debt, and aspiration without reliable knowledge of whether educational offerings will remain relevant amid rapid technological change, automation, and shifting labour markets. This asymmetry of information and power fundamentally challenges assumptions of informed choice and meritocratic reward.
The paper further explores how this risk transfer disproportionately affects learners in the Global South and marginalised contexts, where structural constraints, limited labour-market absorption, and uneven digital transformation exacerbate uncertainty. By reframing education not solely as a public good or private investment, but as a contested site of risk allocation, the study contributes to contemporary debates on marketisation, accountability, and equity in education. The paper concludes by calling for more transparent, participatory, and ethically grounded approaches to educational governance that re-centre learners not as consumers of promised futures, but as co-constructors of meaningful and socially responsive education.
Keywords
Education marketisation, student risk, political economy of education, human capital theory, educational value, uncertainty, higher education governance, Global South education, policy accountability
References
1. Apple, M. W. (2019). Education, markets, and the public good: Revisiting the neoliberal turn. Routledge.
2. Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. University of Chicago Press.
3. Baker, D. (2018). Inequalities in higher education: Socioeconomic status and access to opportunity. Higher Education Policy, 31(2), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-018-0081-1
4. Ball, S. J. (2012). Global education, inc.: New policy networks and the neoliberal imaginary. Routledge.
5. Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago Press.
6. Biesta, G. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Routledge.
7. Biesta, G. (2015). The beautiful risk of education. Routledge.
8. Brown, P., & Hesketh, A. (2004). The mismanagement of talent: Employability and jobs in the knowledge economy. Oxford University Press.
9. Brown, P., Lauder, H., & Ashton, D. (2011). The global auction: The broken promises of education, jobs, and incomes. Oxford University Press.
10. Brown, P., & Souto-Otero, M. (2020). Education, employability, and uncertainty: Labour-market risks for young adults. Journal of Education and Work, 33(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2019.1678978
11. Connell, J. (2011). Education and development in the Pacific islands: Challenges and policy
12. Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerization? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
13. Giroux, H. A. (2014). Neoliberalism’s war on higher education. Haymarket Books.
14. Hodge, S. (2015). Student debt, risk, and inequality in higher education markets. Journal of Education Policy, 30(6), 777–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2015.1031047
15. Ka‘ili, T. (2019). Indigenous knowledge, education, and cultural sustainability in the Pacific. Pacific Studies, 42(2), 201–225.
16. Lauder, H., Brown, P., & Halsey, A. H. (2012). Education, inequality, and the global knowledge economy. In D. Baker & A. LeTendre (Eds.), National differences, global similarities: World culture and the future of schooling (pp. 13–33). Stanford University Press.
17. Livingstone, D. W. (2013). The education-jobs gap: Underemployment or overeducation? Journal of Education and Work, 26(2), 121–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2012.734579
18. Marginson, S. (2016). The worldwide trend to high participation higher education: Dynamics of social stratification in inclusive systems. Higher Education, 72, 413–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0016-x
19. Marginson, S. (2019). Human capital, risk, and the global knowledge economy. Oxford Review of Education, 45(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2018.1541525
20. Ministry of Education, Fiji. (2022). Education sector strategic plan 2022–2030. Suva: Government of Fiji.
21. Naidoo, R., & Jamieson, I. (2005). Empowering students or reproducing privilege? The marketization of higher education. Journal of Education Policy, 20(4), 347–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500108718
22. OECD. (2019). Education at a glance 2019: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f8d7880d-en
23. Oreopoulos, P., & Petronijevic, U. (2013). Making college worth it: A review of research on the returns to higher education. The Future of Children, 23(1), 41–65. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2013.0001
24. Psacharopoulos, G., & Patrinos, H. A. (2018). Returns to investment in education: A decennial review of the global literature. Education Economics, 26(5), 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2018.1484426
25. Prasad, B. (2017). Equity and access in Pacific education systems. Journal of Pacific Education, 3(1), 45–62.
26. Ratuva, S. (2014).
27. UNESCO. (2021). Pacific education report: Challenges and opportunities. Paris: UNESCO.
28. UNICEF. (2020). Pacific education and digital learning report. Suva: UNICEF Pacific.
29. Vass, G. (2014). Cultural knowledge, curriculum design, and student outcomes in Pacific education. Pacific Education Journal, 5(2), 33–50.
30. Walker, M., & Unterhalter, E. (2007). Amartya Sen’s capability approach and social justice in education. Palgrave Macmillan.
31. World Economic Forum. (2020). The future of jobs report 2020. Geneva: WEF.
32. Young, M. (2015). The curriculum of the future: Education and knowledge in an age of uncertainty. Routledge.
33. UNESCO. (2021). Pacific education report: Challenges and opportunities. Paris: UNESCO.
34. UNICEF. (2020). Pacific education and digital learning report. Suva: UNICEF Pacific.
35. Vass, G. (2014). Cultural knowledge, curriculum design, and student outcomes in Pacific education. Pacific Education Journal, 5(2), 33–50.
36. Walker, M., & Unterhalter, E. (2007). Amartya Sen’s capability approach and social justice in education. Palgrave Macmillan.
37. World Economic Forum. (2020). The future of jobs report 2020. Geneva: WEF.
38. Young, M. (2015). The curriculum of the future: Education and knowledge in an age of uncertainty. Routledge.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2026 Davendra Sharma (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC BY 4.0).
Authors retain full copyright of their work.
Content is freely accessible and can be shared or reused with proper attribution.
This ensures open access and promotes global dissemination of knowledge.