Research Articles
| Open Access |
https://doi.org/10.55640/ijssll-06-02-01
Who Is Responsible for the Climate Crisis? Education, Governance, and the Paradoxes of Modern Development
Abstract
The accelerating climate crisis—manifested through global warming, sea-level rise, biodiversity loss, resource depletion, and growing food insecurity, has exposed deep contradictions within dominant models of modernization and development. While technological advancement, economic growth, and globalization have long been celebrated as markers of human progress, these same forces have contributed significantly to ecological degradation and climate vulnerability. This paper critically interrogates the question of responsibility for the climate crisis by examining the interconnected roles of education systems, governance structures, development policies, globalization, and technological transformation. Drawing on interdisciplinary literature from environmental education, critical development theory, political ecology, and governance studies, the paper argues that the climate crisis is not the result of isolated failures but of systemic and institutionalized paradigms that prioritize economic growth over ecological sustainability and social justice.
The analysis highlights how education systems have often reproduced growth-centric ideologies, instrumental views of knowledge, and skills-for-growth narratives, while insufficiently fostering ecological consciousness, ethical responsibility, and critical sustainability thinking. At the governance and policy level, weak accountability mechanisms, fragmented environmental regulation, and inequitable development models have exacerbated environmental degradation, particularly in the Global South and climate-vulnerable regions such as small island developing states. The paper further critiques techno-solutionist approaches that frame innovation as a panacea, obscuring structural inequalities and deflecting responsibility from political and institutional actors.
By reframing responsibility as collective, multi-scalar, and historically situated, this study advances a more nuanced understanding of climate accountability that moves beyond blame toward systemic transformation. It proposes a re-conceptualisation of education as a transformative force for ecological literacy, ethical reasoning, and civic engagement, alongside governance reforms that embed transparency, accountability, and sustainability at the core of development decision-making. The paper contributes to contemporary debates by offering an integrated conceptual lens for understanding the paradoxes of modern development and by outlining pathways toward more just, inclusive, and sustainable futures in an era of escalating climate risk.
Keywords
Climate crisis, education systems, governance and accountability, modernization and development, globalization, technological transformation, sustainability, environmental responsibility, Global South, small island developing states
References
1. Biermann, F., Abbott, K., Andresen, S., Bäckstrand, K., Bernstein, S., Betsill, M. M., Bulkeley, H., Cashore, B., Clapp, J., Folke, C., Gupta, A., Gupta, J., Haas, P. M., Jordan, A., Kanie, N., Kluvánková-Oravská, T., Lebel, L., Liverman, D., Meadowcroft, J., … Zondervan, R. (2012). Navigating the anthropocene: Improving earth system governance. Science, 335(6074), 1306–1307. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1217255
2. Bovens, M., Goodin, R. E., & Schillemans, T. (2018). The Oxford handbook of public accountability. Oxford University Press.
3. Bryant, R. L. (2015). The international handbook of political ecology. Edward Elgar Publishing.
4. Daly, H. E. (2014). Beyond growth: The economics of sustainable development (2nd ed.). Beacon Press.
5. Escobar, A. (2012). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
6. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
7. Harvey, D. (2014). Seventeen contradictions and the end of capitalism. Oxford University Press.
8. Hickel, J. (2020). Less is more: How degrowth will save the world. William Heinemann.
9. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). AR6 synthesis report: Climate change 2023. IPCC.
10. International Energy Agency. (2022). World energy outlook 2022. IEA.
11. Jackson, T. (2017). Prosperity without growth: Foundations for the economy of tomorrow (2nd ed.). Routledge.
12. Lotz-Sisitka, H., Wals, A. E. J., Kronlid, D., & McGarry, D. (2015). Transformative, transgressive social learning: Rethinking higher education pedagogy in times of systemic global dysfunction. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 16, 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.07.018
13. Meadowcroft, J. (2011). Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.003
14. Morozov, E. (2014). To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism. PublicAffairs.
15. Nabobo-Baba, U. (2013). Indigenous education and development in Fiji. Institute of Pacific Studies, University of the South Pacific.
16. Newell, P., Pattberg, P., & Schroeder, H. (2021). Climate governance in turbulent times. Oxford University Press.
17. Nunn, P. D. (2019). Climate change and small island developing states. Climate Research, 40(2–3), 211–231.
18. Orr, D. W. (2004). Earth in mind: On education, environment, and the human prospect (10th anniversary ed.). Island Press.
19. Paterson, M. (2018). Climate change and international political economy. Oxford University Press.
20. Robbins, P. (2020). Political ecology: A critical introduction (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
21. Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., Nykvist, B., de Wit, C. A., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P. K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., … Foley, J. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472–475. https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a
22. Rostow, W. W. (1960). The stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto. Cambridge University Press.
23. Sachs, W. (2015). The development dictionary: A guide to knowledge as power (2nd ed.). Zed Books.
24. Selby, D., & Kagawa, F. (2018). Teachable moments: Education for sustainability in the wake of climate change. UNESCO.
25. Selwyn, N. (2023). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.
26. Shue, H. (2014). Climate justice: Vulnerability and protection. Oxford University Press.
27. Smith, L. T. (2021). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (3rd ed.). Zed Books.
28. Steffen, W., Rockström, J., Richardson, K., Lenton, T. M., Folke, C., Liverman, D., Summerhayes, C. P., Barnosky, A. D., Cornell, S. E., Crucifix, M., Donges, J. F., Fetzer, I., Lade, S. J., Scheffer, M., Winkelmann, R., & Schellnhuber, H. J. (2018). Trajectories of the Earth system in the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(33), 8252–8259. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810141115
29. Sterling, S. (2016). A commentary on education and sustainable development. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 10(2), 208–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408216659157
30. UNESCO. (2020). Education for sustainable development: A roadmap. UNESCO Publishing.
31. UNESCO. (2022). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing.
32. Young, I. M. (2011). Responsibility for justice. Oxford University Press.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2026 Davendra Sharma (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC BY 4.0).
Authors retain full copyright of their work.
Content is freely accessible and can be shared or reused with proper attribution.
This ensures open access and promotes global dissemination of knowledge.