Research Articles
| Open Access |
https://doi.org/10.55640/ijssll-05-12-12
Personality Distortion in Osu Caste System
Abstract
One of the characteristics inherent in Igbo Philosophy is the communitarian nature of Igbo worldviews. Man is a being in relation to others; he cannot exist alone but must exist with others within the community. One of the practices that threaten this relationality or communalism is Osu Caste System, which has been in existence for many decades in most Igbo communities of South Eastern Nigeria. Its origin varies because of the problems of documentation and oral traditions. The consequences of an Osu cut across all spheres of an Osu existence- socially, emotionally, politically, economically, et cetera. Osu could also be classified into: voluntary, dedicated, inherited and Osu by infection or contact. The system of Osu compared with the communitarian structure of Igbo worldview is a distortion of Igbo personhood. The search for African person, personality and personhood started as a reaction to such characterizations of an African person, ipso facto, Igbo person. Juxtaposing Osu Caste System and selfhood formation in Igbo setting, implications abound from the social, political, emotional, economical perspectives. The objective of this work is to show that any distortion of this relatedness that characterized Igbo Communalism has negative consequences on the formation of personhood. Thus, an Osu experiences a distortive personhood which is not integrated, related and presencing. The method of hermeneutics and analysis were used to interpret and analyze the concepts employed in this work. Furthermore, some experts in history and Igbo sages were interviewed. At the end, the intrinsic being of an Osu has been distorted by the tenets of Osu Caste System, thereby distancing an Osu from realizing his personhood in the community of brotherhood.
Keywords
Osu Caste System, Communalism, Distorted Personhood, Disoriented Personhood, Mgbugalu
References
1. Akam, J. B. (1995). The oracle of wisdom: Towards philosophic equipoise. Snaap Press.
2. Arinze, F. A. (1970). Sacrifice in Igbo religion. Ibadan University Press.
3. Basden, G. T. (1966). Among the Igbos of Southern Nigeria. Frank Cass.
4. Duruẹke, C. O. (1985, June 13). Notes on the Osu system among the Igbos of Owerri, Nigeria. Sunday Times.
5. Isaacs, A. (Ed.). (1986). The Macmillan encyclopedia (New ed.). Macmillan.
6. Iroegbu, P. (2000). Kpim of personality: Treatise on the human person. Eustel Publications.
7. Kenyatta, J. (1975). The Gikuyu system of government. In M. Mutiso & S. Rohio (Eds.), Readings in African political thought (pp. xx–xx). Heinemann.
8. Mbiti, J. S. (1969). African religions and philosophy. Heinemann.
9. Mgbobukwa, C. J. (1996). Alusi, Osu and Ohu in Igbo religion and social life. Fulludu Publishing Company.
10. Nyerere, J. (1967). Ujamaa: Essays on socialism. Oxford University Press.
11. Odimegwu, F. H. I. (2006). The human person in African thought: An ontology of communalist personhood (Doctoral dissertation). University of Nigeria, Nsukka.
12. Okeke, I. R. (1986). The Osu concept in Igboland. Access Publishers Ltd.
13. Okigbo, C. B. (2004). Igbo politics and society: The Nnobi story. Sacma Press Ltd.
14. Okigbo, J. S. C. (2007). Okigbo dynasty: Origin of Nnobi.
15. Okoye, C. (2011). ‘Onwe’: An inquiry into the Igbo concept of the self. Ogirisi: A New Journal of African Studies, 8, 54-65.
16. Okpalike, C. J. B. G. (2020). Onweonye: Introducing the concept of self-personhood in Igbo ontology. International Journal of Philosophy, 8(4), 88-97. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijp.20200804.12
17. Uchendu, V. C. (1965). The Igbos of Southeastern Nigeria. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 Okigbo Ferdinand Chukwunwike, Prof. Mmoneke Samuel Ifeanyi, Prof. Nnoruka Sylvanus I. (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC BY 4.0).
Authors retain full copyright of their work.
Content is freely accessible and can be shared or reused with proper attribution.
This ensures open access and promotes global dissemination of knowledge.