Research Articles
| Open Access |
https://doi.org/10.55640/ijssll-02-01-01
Packaging Design's Role in Guiding Children's Healthy Snack Selections: A Literature Review (2018-2024)
Abstract
The influence of packaging design on children's food choices has become an increasingly critical focus in efforts to promote healthier eating habits. This literature review synthesizes empirical studies published between 2018 and 2024 that examine how packaging elements—such as colors, characters, typography, health claims, and interactive features—impact children's snack preferences and perceptions. The review identifies key trends and psychological mechanisms behind packaging appeal, evaluates the effectiveness of design interventions aimed at encouraging healthier choices, and highlights the ethical considerations in targeting child consumers. Findings suggest that child-oriented design can significantly affect snack selection behavior, and that strategic, health-promoting packaging can serve as a valuable tool in public health nutrition strategies. The paper concludes with recommendations for policy, marketing practice, and future research directions.
Keywords
packaging design influence, children's snack choices, healthy eating promotion, food marketing to children, visual design elements, nutritional labeling effectiveness
References
1. Zhang, D. (2018). When age meets culture: An investigation of children’s package design preferences. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 35(2), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-06-2016-1852
2. Zhang, D. (2019). Color Versus Form: Which Matters More in Children’s Preferences of Package Design? Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 31(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2018.1436482
3. Chang, J. T., Wang, B., Chang, C. M., & Ambrose, B. K. (2019). National estimates of poisoning events related to liquid nicotine in young children treated in US hospital emergency departments, 2013–2017. Injury Epidemiology, 6(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-019-0188-9
4. Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2021). What is Qualitative in Research. Qualitative Sociology, 44(4), 599–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-021-09497-w
5. Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice, 2(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z
6. Chan, K., Tse, T., Tam, D., & Huang, A. (2018). Perception of healthy and unhealthy food among Chinese adolescents. Young Consumers, 17(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-03-2015-00520
7. Chang, J. T., Wang, B., Chang, C. M., & Ambrose, B. K. (2019). National estimates of poisoning events related to liquid nicotine in young children treated in US hospital emergency departments, 2013–2017. Injury Epidemiology, 6(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-019-0188-9
8. Cheng, G., Duan, R., Kranz, S., Libuda, L., & Zhang, L. (2019). Development of a Dietary Index to Assess Overall Diet Quality for Chinese School-Aged Children: The Chinese Children Dietary Index. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 116(4), 608–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2015.11.010
9. Franklin, R. L., & Rodgers, G. B. (2018). Unintentional Child Poisonings Treated in United States Hospital Emergency Departments: National Estimates of Incident Cases, Population-Based Poisoning Rates, and Product Involvement. Pediatrics, 122(6), 1244–1251. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-3551
10. Gioia, D. (2021). A Systematic Methodology for Doing Qualitative Research. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 57(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886320982715
11. Gomez, T., Anaya, Y. B., Shih, K. J., & Tarn, D. M. (2021). A Qualitative Study of Primary Care Physicians’ Experiences With Telemedicine During COVID-19. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 34(Supplement), S61–S70. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2021.S1.200517
12. Grieve, R., Woodley, J., Hunt, S. E., & McKay, A. (2021). Student fears of oral presentations and public speaking in higher education: A qualitative survey. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(9), 1281–1293. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1948509
13. He, B., Prasad, S., Higashi, R. T., & Goff, H. W. (2019). The art of observation: A qualitative analysis of medical students’ experiences. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 234. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1671-2
14. Hui, T. K. L., Mohammed, B., Donyai, P., McCrindle, R., & Sherratt, R. S. (2020). Enhancing Pharmaceutical Packaging through a Technology Ecosystem to Facilitate the Reuse of Medicines and Reduce Medicinal Waste. Pharmacy, 8(2), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy8020058
15. Jamshed, S. (2014). Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation. Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy, 5(4), 87. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.141942
16. Kędra, J., & Žakevičiūtė, R. (2019). Visual literacy practices in higher education: What, why and how? Journal of Visual Literacy, 38(1–2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144X.2019.1580439
17. Dial, L. A. (2021). Are Fruit Snacks Like Fruit? Children’s and Parents’ Evaluations of Deceptive Packaged Foods. (Cited as per provided information).
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC BY 4.0).
Authors retain full copyright of their work.
Content is freely accessible and can be shared or reused with proper attribution.
This ensures open access and promotes global dissemination of knowledge.