Publisher Home ↗ editor@randspublications.org
International journal of statistics eISSN 2051-8285 Submit Article
Articles Open access

Exploring the Combined Influence of Personality, Motivation, and Self-Regulation on Academic Success in Higher Education

Published
Pages 10-15
Views 20
Downloads 17

Authors

  • Dr. Anika Sharma Department of Statistics, University of Kathmandu, Nepal Author

DOI

https://doi.org/10.55640/ijs-06-04-02 ↗

Abstract

Academic success in higher education is influenced by multiple interconnected psychological, behavioral, and institutional factors. Traditional educational systems primarily evaluated academic performance through examination outcomes and cognitive capability, whereas contemporary higher education increasingly recognizes the importance of personality traits, motivation, and self-regulation in shaping student achievement. The expansion of learner-centered educational models, digital learning environments, and quality-oriented academic systems has intensified the need to understand how psychosocial dimensions affect academic persistence, engagement, and performance. This technical paper explores the combined influence of personality, motivation, and self-regulation on academic success within higher education institutions while connecting these variables with quality management and knowledge management practices.

The paper adopts a conceptual and analytical approach based exclusively on the provided references related to quality management, organizational learning, educational improvement, and knowledge management systems. The study argues that academic achievement is not solely dependent on intellectual ability but emerges from interactions among learner personality characteristics, motivational persistence, self-regulatory behavior, and institutional support systems. Personality influences adaptability, communication, discipline, and learning engagement. Motivation drives persistence, effort allocation, and educational commitment, while self-regulation enables students to manage learning behavior, monitor progress, and adapt strategies according to academic demands.

The paper further examines how Total Quality Management (TQM), knowledge management practices, leadership approaches, and institutional quality frameworks contribute to student success by creating supportive educational environments. Effective higher education institutions integrate quality teaching, collaborative learning, organizational knowledge sharing, and student-centered learning systems to enhance learner motivation and self-regulatory capacity.

The analysis demonstrates that students exhibiting high motivational orientation, structured self-regulation, and adaptive personality characteristics consistently achieve stronger academic outcomes. Simultaneously, institutions implementing effective quality management and knowledge-sharing systems improve educational engagement and learning performance. The paper concludes that academic success in higher education should be understood through an integrated multidimensional framework combining psychological factors with institutional quality mechanisms. The study contributes to educational management research by highlighting the strategic relationship between psychosocial learner variables and institutional quality systems in promoting sustainable academic excellence.

Keywords

Academic Success , Personality , Motivation , Self-Regulation , Higher Education , Total Quality Management , Knowledge Management , Student Performance , Educational Quality , Learning Behavior

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. K. Almurshidee, “The Implementation of TQM in Higher Education Institutions in Saudi Arabia: Marketing Prospective,” Global Journal of Management and Business Research, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2017.

2. S. Anyamele, A Study of Leadership Approaches to Quality Improvement in University Management–Nigerian and Finnish Cases. Finland, Helsinki : Helsinki University Press, 2004.

3. P. Chourides, D. Longbottom, and W. Murphy, “Excellence in knowledge management: an empirical study to identify critical factors and performance measures,” Measuring Business Excellence, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 29–45, 1 2003. [Online]. Available: Available:

4. S. Chong and P. Ho, Quality teaching and learning: a quality assurance framework for initial teacher preparation programmes, 2009, vol. 3, no. 34. [Online]. Available: 10.1504/ijmie.2009.027352.

5. R. Felder and R. Brent, “How to Improve Teaching Quality,” Quality Management Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 9–21, 1999. [Online]. Available: 10.1080/10686967.1999.11919183.

6. A. J. A. Honarpour and K. M. Nor, “Knowledge Management, Total Quality Management and Innovation: A New Look ”, Journal of technology management & innovation, 1 2012, vol. 7, no. 3.

7. S. Hsu and H. Shen, “" Knowledge management and its relationship with TQM ”, Total Quality Management &," Business Excellence, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 351–361, 1 2005. [Online]. Available: Available:

8. R. Jabeen, A. Shehu, R. Mahmood, and B. Mata, “TQM and Knowledge management impacts on SME performance,” International Postgraduate Business Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 23–43, 2014, Accessed 8 January 2018.

9. M. Jaraiedi and D. Ritz Total Quality Management Applied to Engineering Education, 1994, vol. 2, no. 1, 10.1108/09684889410054563 [Accessed 18 August 2018. [Online]. Available: Available:

10. G. Kanji, A. Tambi, and W. Wallace, “A comparative study of quality practices in higher education institutions in the US and Malaysia,” Total Quality Management, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 357–371, 1999, 10.1080/0954412997884 [Accessed 30 January 2018. [Online]. Available: Available:

11. M. Khalifa and V. Liu, “Determinants of successful knowledge management programs,” Electronic Journal on Knowledge Management, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 103–112, 2003, Accessed 8 January 2019.

12. M. Khoja, M. Lemon, J. Fisher, and A. Algaddafi, “Integrating the Total Quality Management and Sustainability in the Libyan Higher Education System by Evaluating the Policy and Strategy,” International Journal of Learning and Teaching, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 160–165, 2017, Available: 10.18178/ijlt.3.2.160-165 [Accessed 10 January 2018.

13. F. Ozmen, “" The capabilities of the educational organizations in making use of tacit knowledge ”, Procedia - Social and," Behavioral Sciences, vol. 9, pp. 1860–1865, 2010, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.414 [Accessed 10 September 2018. [Online]. Available: Available:

14. M. Parthasarathy, N. Rapur, and P. Krishnan, Criteria That Influence the Quality of Higher Education, Republic, 2005.

15. B. Qasrawi, S. Almahamid, and S. Qasrawi, “The impact of TQM practices and KM processes on organisational performance,” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1034–1055, 9 2017. [Online]. Available: Available:

16. P. V. Ramjeawon and J. Rowley, “Knowledge management in higher education institutions: enablers and barriers in Mauritius,” The Learning Organization, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 366–377, 2017.

17. V. Ribiere, “Assessing Knowledge Management Initiative Successes as a Function of Organizational Culture,” 2001.

18. G. Southon and R. Todd, “" Knowledge Management: A Social Perspective ”, in the knowledge management conference KNOW’99," 1999.

Explore related research

Similar Articles

1-10 of 31

Search the journal

Find articles by title, author or keyword.